Showing posts with label sledging. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sledging. Show all posts

Saturday, May 3, 2008

Slapping and Sledging

The most talked about topic in corporate corridors these days, is not so much whether the RBI hike in CRR will curb inflation, or whether the export disincentives for steel and the import reductions for its raw materials will do the trick, but whether sledging is right and if a slap is the best response! Given the media columns devoted to this “national incident” and the larger issue of sledging in sports, here are a few nuggets on this episode that probably deserve second thoughts.

To the discerning, it would be clear that the 'word' is and has always been, mightier than the “sword”. In any conflict, or intense rivalry, the 'word' has been used to telling effect. Most people now concur, that its the 'mental victory' that is crucial and which dictates the events in the physical plane.

Those who have been part of the 91% viewership that the serial garnered on Sunday mornings, a couple of decades ago, would be familiar with the “Mahabharata”. (Other sources of awareness also exist! ). The focal point of the epic was the Bhagawad Geeta. It was essentially the power of 'words' that lifted Arjuna from an 'anxiety attack' and gave him the resolve and the mental strength to realize his potential.

The much debated “Sethusamudram bridge”, which is the news these days, has an interesting anecdote attached with it, in the epics. The Ramayana refers to the time prior to its construction, when the sea had to be crossed through other means. “Hanuman” was told, that he alone, could jump across and reach Lanka. A feat, he felt, was beyond him. It is said that Jambavan, another simian, referred to incidents in Hanuman's life, where as a child, he almost reached the Sun and convinced him, that it was within him to reach Lanka on his own. This is often referred to as “Jambavani”. 'Jambavani' is something that helps someone realize his true, latent, strength. Parents are advised by psychologists to provide positive 'auto suggestions' to children that work as 'Jambavani'. If we were to use modern terminology "Pygmalion Effect" or "self fulfilling prophecy" are the terms in use. Pygmalion effect naturally comes from G.B. Shaw's play of the same name, where Eliza Doolittle mentions that for Prof Higgins, she will always be a "cockney girl" because that is what he expects her to be while for others like Colonel Pickering, she will be a lady with etiquette since that is what they expect her to be! The learning her is that people take 'cues' from the environment and behave.

In a book titled "Winning Habits" by B.P. Bam, he also talks about the power of verbalisation and visualisation. Verbalisation is according to him about meditation and chanting, while visualisation is about projecting yourself to a higher level than where you are currently. Verbalisation through mantras and chants help in creating the right imagery, concentration and in focusing on the moment. Like Arjuna who saw only the target, for success focus is key both on the physical and mental planes. Visualisation is supposed to build muscle memory and create subsequent natural responses. Something which Rahul Dravid claims he has benefited by. Mathew Hayden is known to sit at the batting pitch prior to the match to visualize the actual subsequent inning he is to play. Batsmen are known to repeatedly do well in a venue and this is to some extent, due to the venue triggering nueral maps, that are positive.

There is a lesser known tale of Karna and his charioteer “Shalya”. It is believed that Shalya constantly was ‘chatting’ with Karna and reminding him of his birth in a low caste family, a sore point, with the otherwise brilliant warrior. Apparently, this led to the warrior fighting depression and the Pandavas!. To make things worse, he could not kill any of the Pandavas except Arjuna, because he had given his word to Kunti, who confesses to him that she is his biological mother, one day prior to battle. To make things worse, Karna was also constantly the target of jibes from Bhishma and on the occasion of Kurukshetra, chose not to fight for his friend Duryodhana, as long as Bhishma was leading the Kaurava army. Parashurama his guru, gives him a 'curse' which is an 'auto suggestion' of sorts that he will forget all that the learned, at the most crucial time. It works like a self fulfilling prophecy at the Kurukshetra, when he is without a chariot and he falls to Arjuna. Karna is also burdened by the fact that he knows that he is fighting a loosing battle. There are references that Vyasa gives, which indicate that Karna knew who Krishna was and how the battle would end. He still chooses to do his duty by his friend and benefactor. Karna is a clear case of a talent that is unmatched and without equals being denied a platform and circumstances to flower and find full realization. Something that is a common occurrence in sports, arts and even in the corporate arena. Being denied admission due to caste, community, colour, being discriminated for the same reasons, being forced to work for not so ethical people, or for organisations and teams whose value system does not match with one's, being forced to do jobs not suited to one's skills and ability, are all situations a lot of talented people are faced with. Having a "shalya" remind you of that is a sure fire trip to "disaster" or "self destruct".

A mild form of shalya vani would be the 'ash scanning' , or head on comparisons that companies do. Sometimes it is straightforward competition and sometimes it looks like juvenile gamesmanship.The Pepsi – Cola wars are full of such anecdotes. The “nothing official about it” was a “slap” on Coca Cola. Now too, the exclusivity that Coca Cola has on advertising has been made to look silly with Pepsi coolers in the background and obliging commentators (whose grandchildren are probably the target audience) endorsing the brand! Sprite in turn is intent on taking the mickey out of Pepsi and seems to winning the share of “sniggers and laughter market” and possibly the seedhi baat is that it is garnering market share too.Taking huge hoardings outside the competitors office is one way of gaining a psychological advantage. There are many more when you get down to the shopfloor.

A variant of this, is the malicious rumour, or character assassination.

The Ramayana mentions how a malicious Mantara’s words led to Kaikeyi’s shift in attitude and her asking for her stepson’s exile to the forest. This inspite of the fact that she had a lot of affection for her nephew and that it was reciprocated with respect.The 'Maryada Purushan' himself was also not immune to “words”. A stray remark from a washerman apparently led to Sita being banished. Never mind that he won her after breaking the Gandivam and that she followed him to the forest, not to mention the fact that she was pregnant with his children.

The corporate world is not innocent of this either. To bring down a colleague who seems to be moving a little too fast, we find the grape vine suddenly buzzing with a few details of his misdeeds which could be complete fiction. Sometimes it is a lot more open with snide remarks and innuendos in the open.

Media releases both direct and through leaks are made to get competitive advantage.The “Rising” of an Amir Khan was stopped with a rumour that collections were poor at the opening, when it was not so. A simple use of words to render a project futile. When Camay International was launched, there was a rumour that it contained “beef tallow”. The damage control was done, but it did cause a stutter at the retail level. Sting operations are a sophisticated variation of this and where technology makes credibility built in.

Whistle blowing is a threat most companies guard against. Most sensible companies ensure that an employee who is leaving becomes an ambassador of the company and not a source of negative word of mouth.

In the light of all this,where does sledging fit in?

Sledging seeks to reverse the positive imagery that helps someone or a team play to its potential. When sledging, rumour mongering, press releases about opponents misdeeds, failures etc, trigger negativity and anxiety in the target, the sledger is successful. The objective of sledging is to make the other player loose concentration and trigger negative images in him. Given the rules of the game, if he looses to provocation on the field, the results are disastrous. The Zinadine Zidane vs Masseratti at the World Cup is an example. If the target is provoked, but cannot do anything about it, the stress sets in. The ones who are mentally strong react with more focus and aggression which may boomerang on the sledger. Remember the Yuvraj – Flintoff episode and the recent Shane Warne - Afridi episode? . For McGrath, the sledge came back like a boomerang, when Sarwan retorted and touched a raw nerve.But it did work against Rahul Dravid in South Africa, when Alan Donald tried it. Sidhu was a target for most people because he used to oblige every sledge with a response. Slater is known to loose it as also Daryl Cullinan.

Dhoni got it dead right when he said that there is an art to sledging. A shrewd assessor of situations, he has hit the nail on the head. The elements of sledging would require a good knowledge of the target, his weak points, the selection of the right time and the occasion. Using abusive language is indicative of poor parentage. Slapping people in full view of cameras is indicative of a lack of common sense.

There is a time and place for everything and if done with a plan, things work out fine.

ENDS...

Saturday, April 26, 2008

IPL ,Cheer Leaders, Bar Girls and Brawls

Feels good when your instincts and prognosis come out right!(please refer to the earlier post on the IPL prospects)

According to the TAM data, the first match played between the Kolkata Knight Riders and the Royal Challengers Bangalore generated a TVR of 7.2, the highest rating across the country. This match was a bigger hit in the six metros alone, reaching a TVR of 8.59, the highest recorded so far.
SET is set to hike adspot rates. NOKIA says that the IPL is paisa vasool and thanks SRK in no small measure.

What has driven this viewership?

Well, the schedule for starters, most matches are in the evening, except on weekends when it is in the late afternoon. Its the vacation season, when people are looking for at home entertainment, being forced to stay indoors due to the heat. (In the malls in Dubai, Summer is the time when footfall is the highest due to the heat outside!!) In India, people seem to curl up in front of the TV, to watch this exciting "feature film" of 3.5 -4 hours.

Quality of Entertainment:

The format heightens the ups and downs and makes for exciting viewing. Just one over and one single person, can change the script, so it is riveting to watch. Wood whacking leather and the resultant high scoring makes for guaranteed excitement. Especially, for those who do not form part of the cognoscenti and don't appreciate the subtleties of the game. No, it does not attract women because cheer leaders in skimpy clothes do not attract hetrosexual women with children. Naturally, the viewership has a strong male bias, which is what the TAM data indicates. The "extra" portions thanks to SET are horrendous to say the least. While the lady with the American capital for a surname is professional and seems sober and knowledgeable, her male counterpart makes the viewer cringe and want to do what Harbhajan did to Sreeshanth! The same goes for the anchors. Compared to what one is used to with ESPN and even NEO, the SET coverage is pathetic to say the least. Even the camera work and editing is substandard. For some strange reason the "Business Heads" in SET seem to be using very little of that part of the anatomy which is referred to in their designation. Given that it is making losses steadily, and delivering duds with monotonous regularity, it probably is only to be expected.

One source of revenue is gate collections and the crowds are being wooed in with the help of cheerleaders . Sponsors get a hefty share of the gate collection though it is small in the overall context.Cheerleaders however have complained that they often end up having to cope with "rowdy" elements and not so refined responses to the bump n grind that they put up.

Incidentally, the RR Patil Govt is being dragged over hot coals on the double standards applied to obscenity in public performances. While bars in Mumbai , which had women dancers who did similar routines with more clothes on, were banned for obscenity and for being anti social, the cheerleaders are being shown on national television, and that too, during prime time. Well that's a controversy that will take its own course with interesting arguments from both sides. The most amusing is that cheerleaders don't take tips from spectators and so families are safe:) and the men don't loose hard earned money for nothing!! But the other side is equally vehement with parents complaining that kids now think its perfectly okay to dance in the living room with pompoms and and in undergarments as the aunties on TV are doing!!! While most item numbers in movies are equally raunchy, parents have an option of ensuring that they are not embarrased in front of their children by some advance gatekeeping as far as TV viewing is concerned.

My verdict: Avoidable, the cheerleaders, we don't seem ready for it as yet. IPL is not certified for adult viewing as of now!!!

Some not so adult behaviour from Bhajji. Sreeshant is juvenile and probably got what he deserved. If his behaviour had been the same on the streets of Cochin he would have got worse. However to do that when teams are shaking hands makes you think that Symmonds and Hayden had a point about our man, Bhaji. As a leader, he is a disaster. He needs to learn a few basics on handling failure. Blaming everyone and saying "I am doing my best" is not enough. Motivating others to give their best is the role of the captain. Our man does not even know that. He is best left to tweak the leather on disintegrating pitches ...Mumbai Indians can do better and thankfully we have Dhoni to lead the national team God Bless Him!!



Monday, October 8, 2007

Cheeky Monkey

http://ishare.rediff.com/filevideo.php?id=36108
This is a hilarious video and on rediff's ishare page. Reminds me of sreeshant and his antics against Symonds and Hayden. Hilarious and insightful. Very effective. Very true of some characters you see in offices , clubs etc who managed to get under someones skin without being physically intimidating.