Showing posts with label advertising awards. Show all posts
Showing posts with label advertising awards. Show all posts

Thursday, April 18, 2013

Moving on from the “F” words…Indian Advertising.



Moving on from the “F” words…Indian Advertising.
If Indian advertising has been trending recently, it has been for the Ford Figo Fiasco. And F words have since been used liberally around it.
Festering at GoaFest.
Controversies still continue around Goa Fest, India’s answer to the Cannes. Leo Burnett and BBDO followed JWT on the scam trail. Leo Burnett ‘s radio spots for Tata Salt Lite  were not paid for by its client and BBDO’s entry for DHL couriers was found to be very similar to work done in Singapore by Ogilvy for Allied Pickford. Both ended up having to return their awards. It is likely that many more  agencies may also join that club, including the likes of DDB Mudra, McCann Erickson, JWT, et al, if plagiarism is proved. Goa Fest therefore, has every likelihood of festering into a Goa Farce.
Finding the Fountainhead

There is indeed a need for the Indian advertising industry to introspect and meditate on where it is headed and what it needs to do.
Marketing companies need advertising agencies, simply because agencies can do something which they cannot , even if they had the spare time.  That “something”, is the talent to unleash the drama in the given product, in a memorable manner, through mass media. The agency therefore has to have a DNA pool , that produces ideas which can be monetized both by the agency and the client. Awards ,to an extent, build credibility for this claim, since they represent an endorsement by the peer group. This is the only rational reason for awards and for Agencies to go hunting for them.
In an interview, the head of a network mentioned that awards actually translated into the agency being able to make better margins for the services rendered. The awards providing credibility to the claim of superior creative firepower within the agency.
Agency heads have therefore been pushing for metals to be won and showcased.  While this is perfectly a valid ambition, the means adopted to meet this requirement have been suspect at times.
Frauds and Followers .
Talent spotting and nurturing the right talent possibly has been a casualty in agencies. Allegations of recruitment interviews becoming “idea shopping festivals” are rife. Creative Directors are alleged to move jobs with their own cliques in tandem. These cliques reportedly include “preferred” vendors for film making, model coordination, photography and even printing! Cabals emerge as power centers, driving away those who are not party to the “setting”. These often include talented, but upright professionals. Plagiarism of ideas within the agency and names being excluded from creative ownership lists are also refrains heard often. Absence of genuine talent could very well be a consequence in the agency. As an Indian saying goes, “you cannot grow mangoes from jackfruit seeds”. Scams, plagiarized work and work done by freelancers, find their way into award shows. 
Filmi Fever
Celebrity endorsements in India have been the norm recently with astronomical sums being paid to “brand ambassadors”. Rather than ideas that are rooted in the product truth, it is the “celebrity fit” that seems to guide creative ideas. The brand differentiation is therefore linked to the celebrity endorser. Apart from the risk and implications for long term brand health, what is worrisome is the questionable nexus between the celebrities and the Creative Directors. Brand ambassadors end up endorsing film scripts written by the CD’s and finally starring in it.  Ads done to curry favor with movie stars are not exactly award winning stuff. Scams therefore suddenly find life around the awards season.
Fooling the Client
Random viewing of commercials and ads in recent times leaves most people perplexed. Even basic comprehension can sometimes be an issue.  In a majority of the work released, the “consumers’ voice” is clearly not heard and the “consumer insight” is therefore conspicuous by its absence. The work therefore, has body and craft, but no soul. It would not provoke the consumer to move even a muscle. It is something that alienates clients and results in scam entries at awards. With the economy sliding into stagflation, advertising spends have begun to diminish. Patience with the Agency’s non-performance at the market place would probably have worn thin. Celebrity endorsements have been fatalities in many brand plans. Plagiarism for many clients is tantamount to counterfeiting and faking of intellectual property ownership. Releasing of brand communication without due approval would mean violation of copyright and the contract itself. Quod erat demonstrandum, agencies putting priority to awards over market share, and indulging in scams and plagiarism, may soon discover that an irate Client has put paid to the relationship.
False  Favors
Given their self- absorbed life styles, one would be forgiven for claiming that Corporate Social Responsibility is something that is preached, but never practiced by agencies and people who populate them. However it has been a happy hunting ground for most creative agencies. Many sneer that these campaigns are akin to the devil quoting the scriptures.  But the scriptures have somehow been used well enough to win awards in this category. It is, however, a big question mark whether the target audience ever saw this campaign and if it was given sufficient media weights to cross the threshold level. A tea brand recently did a highly rated campaign for encouraging people to vote. The voting percentage however dropped drastically in the following elections in Mumbai, the capital of Indian advertising.  
There is also lax follow up when it comes to these causes. Adoption campaigns have been created, but not a single soul has continued with the effort to see where this issue has progressed to. Gender discrimination and domestic violence have been cause célèbre in the advertising world, but people accused of sexual harassment still find favor and patronage in these circles. It is as if even charitable causes are being plundered for personal glory.


Finally, the way Forward
It is clear that lust for awards without the consumer connect would only lead to a rape of the brand. Something that is clearly unwanted in India. To free itself from the shackles of the ills plaguing it, the Indian advertising fraternity needs to move towards genuine passion for “the work” and nothing but “the work”.  Then would come the greater glory and the good.
God be with us.

ENDS.( 1040 words)

VINOD NATESAN
Mayan Consultants International.

QUICK PROFILE:
Mr. Vinod Natesan, runs a boutique brand and marketing consultancy  Mayan Consultants  International, In the 21 years in the industry, he has been associated with agencies like JWT, Lowe Lintas, Leo Burnett, McCann Erickson and has been responsible to clients such as UniLever, Procter &Gamble, Kelloggs, De Beers, Merrill Lynch, Diageo, Samsung, Bayer, Reliance,Tata ,Mahindra and HDFC. Awards and recognitions include a Clio (bronze), an Effie and numerous nominations at the London, and New York Festivals. He has had international exposure having done stints in East Africa (Nairobi) and the Middle East. The Emirate of Ras Al Khaimah in the UAE was ranked by the Oxford Business Group as one of the fastest rising FDI destinations in the region during his tenure as the Head of Operations at the RAK Investment Authority in 2006.He has also been a visiting faculty in most of the management institutes in Mumbai University since 1996.
ENDS…



 Related links.









Thursday, April 2, 2009

GOA FESTIVAL: ISSUE OF ETHICS

http://www.afaqs.com/perl/news/story.html?sid=23705

The above is a link that appeared in the afaqs and which has sparked a debate on matters of ethics.This has largely to do with jury members leaking the results to the media in spite of a Non-Disclosure-Agreement and the publications carrying the story, causing "humiliation"(?)on the organisers! The publication, ET has also given a spirited reply which has been carried in the same article in the comments section.

I have my views which are given below.These pertain to similar revelation of likely results by a jury member on the Effie Awards 2008 which caused serious concern amongst those who prescribed to some old values of propriety and fair play.

Two quotes from DHUNJI WADIA, JWT Mumbai, jury member on the Effie 2008 panel.

AFAQS on 11th November: "Effies 2008" "Afaqs! met with a few jury members during the judging round to find out what they thought of the entries that they'd already been through .Dhunji Wadia, expressed his disappointment: "There has been repetition in some cases. Since the brands were present last year as well, some of them don't really hit you as a great idea"" .
Exchange 4 Media on 25th Nov08. "Effie 2008 awards to be announced". On his expectations, Dhunji Wadia, commented, “This year saw a keen competition from some defining case studies that have raised the bar for the Indian advertising and communication industry. JWT has eight finalists and we are hoping for the best.” However, when asked about his personal favourite campaign from the finalist, all Wadia said was, “All the eight finalists from JWT are my favourites. Some have already shown results in other global and local competitions and as for the others their time will come"

The two quotes above seem to indicate a worrisome trend in terms of ethics to me. Awards are benchmarks of talent and proven performance and relied upon by the industry as a benchmark. It also makes careers. When comments are made to media by those deemed to be industry leaders, which indicate a lack of objectivity, lack of consistency and raises the possibility of bias, there is serious lack of credibility as far as awards go. What it means to me is that comments of the industry regarding their peers and their work should now be vetted against facts before conclusions are drawn. As for the poor thousands who waste precious time and money in sending in entries, hoping for a fair trial and honest feedback, well, I guess these expose's will help them decide!
As for Advertisers/Marketing Professionals, the fact that Non Disclosure Agreements seem to hold NO importance to senior professionals in the advertising industry should be cause for concern. Similar NDA's are signed by Agency Heads prior to product launches and it is often that one finds that the competition was privy to the story board and media schedules. This report will surely raise a lot of questions which will need answers.
Lastly, I am of the opinion that Economic Times and Brand Equity did what any vigorous, intrepid journal would do, report the truth without fear or favour. That this has caused them to face a barrage of protests, simply indicates that they have stamped on many raw nerves. The "Washington Post" did not hold back the "Watergate" wondering what it would do to the institution of the American President, did it? Arun Shourie caused a fuorore with the cement scandal and others, "Tehelka" made us wiser about the possible corruption in defence circles, a Non Govt Agency told us that we were consuming pesticides alongwith soft drinks, we learned that the uncertainty of the game of cricket was not so uncertain and probably was to a plan we were not privy to, we also were shocked to know that the TRP sample was not as private and sacrosanct as we thought, when the list landed up on media reception desks.The list goes on.

None of these journalists received bouquets and had to cope with backlashes of various kinds, this includes being insulted with verbal abuse in industry get togethers(Nearly a decade back, a lady correspondent from the "Brief" magazine was subject to this by a very respectable agency head and on one occasion, threats were issued to withdraw a story on non-compensation of a story to do with non payment of dues )Anyway,this is what the profession is all about and as a reader, I am eternally grateful to these intrepid people who risk their livelihood to do their job right.I hope they continue with their crusade for the truth, work as ombudsmen and bite when required.

Good Night and Good Luck
(Yes there is a fabulous movie by that name on the journalistic zeal and spirit)